Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
»  VoivodFan   » Technocratic Manipulators   » Ann

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Ann
Mezcalhead
VoivodFan
Member # 26

posted June 07, 2006 21:04     Profile for Mezcalhead   Email Mezcalhead     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Did you see this Warcorpse:
http://www.gawker.com/news/ann-coulter/

 |  IP: Logged
X-D
VoivodFan
Member # 3

posted June 08, 2006 00:03     Profile for X-D   Email X-D     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Nice.

--------------------

I am a robot... bleep blop bloop


 |  IP: Logged
LyKcantropen
VoivodFan
Member # 162

posted June 08, 2006 06:41     Profile for LyKcantropen   Email LyKcantropen     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
A question to ponder - what is the purpose of Ann Coulter? Answers on a postcard.
 |  IP: Logged
Delightful Little Capuchin Monkey
VoivodFan
Member # 65

posted June 08, 2006 07:34     Profile for Delightful Little Capuchin Monkey   Email Delightful Little Capuchin Monkey     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Haha, what a cunt!
 |  IP: Logged
KnickerZohnonnof
VoivodFan
Member # 272

posted June 08, 2006 08:04     Profile for KnickerZohnonnof   Email KnickerZohnonnof     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Now that is scary.

--------------------

Hail Santa...


 |  IP: Logged
Mezcalhead
VoivodFan
Member # 26

posted June 08, 2006 11:48     Profile for Mezcalhead   Email Mezcalhead     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
If you guys would wipe the tears from your eyes and LISTEN to what she's saying you might think differently. I found Matt Laurer to be the outrageous one in that vid, not Ann. I just wish it'd been Katie in that doing the questions instead of Matty boy.

Its true, they're using their husband's deaths for political ends...which goes hand in hand with the great liberal strategy of victimology. Its total bullshit and she's just calling them on it.


 |  IP: Logged
Skul
VoivodFan
Member # 19

posted June 08, 2006 13:36     Profile for Skul   Email Skul     Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
She still deserves to die a horrible, very public death. Karma is a bitch, and so is Ann.
 |  IP: Logged
X-D
VoivodFan
Member # 3

posted June 08, 2006 19:43     Profile for X-D   Email X-D     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Mezcalhead:
Its true, they're using their husband's deaths for political ends...which goes hand in hand with the great liberal strategy of victimology. Its total bullshit and she's just calling them on it.

And raising controversy on national television is an tried and true way to sell books. Ann Coulter just stoops lower than most. Sorry man, she's a total cunt.

--------------------

I am a robot... bleep blop bloop


 |  IP: Logged
Mezcalhead
VoivodFan
Member # 26

posted June 08, 2006 20:58     Profile for Mezcalhead   Email Mezcalhead     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by X-D:
And raising controversy on national television is an tried and true way to sell books. Ann Coulter just stoops lower than most. Sorry man, she's a total cunt.

Ahhh I was waiting for this one. Here is the difference between Ann selling books and making millions and the Jersey Girls. The Jersey Girls are using their role in a NATIONAL TRAGEDY to make millions, prance around the media as celebs, and most importantly use that status as a mouthpiece for the left. That is the key difference. That is what she is pointing out and that is what you guys keep missing.

See Mike, this is one reason why I'm on the Right. Its tactics like these used by liberals that irk the fuck out of me. Coulter is a writer who exposes these people for what they really are and makes a good living doing it(plus she doesn't give a shit what anybody thinks).


 |  IP: Logged
K
VoivodFan
Member # 6

posted June 09, 2006 11:59     Profile for K   Email K     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Mez. With all due respect, you are way off the mark on this one.
Ann Coulter has slandered these women and deserves to have her pants sued off for doing so.
Her tactics are gutter-level low and its sad to see you defending such a person.

These women (9-11 Widows) have never once slandered Ann or anyone else in any interview.
They are only seeking the TRUTH about why they're husbands died.
Not just they're husbands, but all the other victims as well.

What is so wrong with wanting that Mez?

You are so short-sighted to say that these women are on the Left and Liberals.
I guess that ANYONE who wants another INDEPENDENT Investigation into 9-11 are Left Liberals?
You lump all good truth-seekers into one boat and that is wrong.

If you are on the Right as you say you are...then i guess that you will believe anything that anyone from the Right says? The current Administration in the White House, Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, Pat Robertson as well?

I ask you to now read the 9-11 Widows Official response to Ann Coulter's cold-hearted slander and lies.
Notice how professional it is.
Also...I challenge you to refute any one of theyre objectives listed.

::::::

We did not choose to become widowed on September 11, 2001. The attack, which tore our families apart and destroyed our former lives, caused us to ask some serious questions regarding the systems that our country has in place to protect its citizens.

Through our constant research, we came to learn how the protocols were supposed to have worked. Thus, we asked for an independent commission to investigate the loopholes which obviously existed and allowed us to be so utterly vulnerable to terrorists. Our only motivation ever was to make our Nation safer. Could we learn from this tragedy so that it would not be repeated?

We are forced to respond to Ms. Coulter’s accusations to set the record straight because we have been slandered.

Contrary to Ms. Coulter’s statements, there was no joy in watching men that we loved burn alive. There was no happiness in telling our children that their fathers were never coming home again. We adored these men and miss them every day.

It is in their honor and memory, that we will once again refocus the Nation’s attention to the real issues at hand: our lack of security, leadership and progress in the five years since 9/11.

We are continuously reminded that we are still a nation at risk. Therefore, the following is a partial list of areas still desperately in need of attention and public outcry. We should continuously be holding the feet of our elected officials to the fire to fix these shortcomings.

1. Homeland Security Funding based on risk. Inattention to this area causes police officers, firefighters and other emergency/first responder personnel to be ill equipped in emergencies. Fixing this will save lives on the day of the next attack.

2. Intelligence Community Oversight. Without proper oversight, there exists no one joint, bicameral intelligence panel with power to both authorize and appropriate funding for intelligence activities. Without such funding we are unable to capitalize on all intelligence community resources and abilities to thwart potential terrorist attacks. Fixing this will save lives on the day of the next attack.

3. Transportation Security. There has been no concerted effort to harden mass transportation security. Our planes, buses, subways, and railways remain under-protected and highly vulnerable. These are all identifiable soft targets of potential terrorist attack. The terror attacks in Spain and London attest to this fact. Fixing our transportation systems may save lives on the day of the next attack.

4. Information Sharing among Intelligence Agencies. Information sharing among intelligence agencies has not improved since 9/11. The attacks on 9/11 could have been prevented had information been shared among intelligence agencies. On the day of the next attack, more lives may be saved if our intelligence agencies work together.

5. Loose Nukes. A concerted effort has not been made to secure the thousands of loose nukes scattered around the world – particularly in the former Soviet Union. Securing these loose nukes could make it less likely for a terrorist group to use this method in an attack, thereby saving lives.

6. Security at Chemical Plants, Nuclear Plants, Ports. We must, as a nation, secure these known and identifiable soft targets of Terrorism. Doing so will save many lives.

7. Border Security. We continue to have porous borders and INS and Customs systems in shambles. We need a concerted effort to integrate our border security into the larger national security apparatus.

8. Civil Liberties Oversight Board. Given the President’s NSA Surveillance Program and the re-instatement of the Patriot Act, this Nation is in dire need of a Civil Liberties Oversight Board to insure that a proper balance is found between national security versus the protection of our constitutional rights.

-- September 11th Advocates

Kristen Breitweiser
Patty Casazza
Monica Gabrielle
Mindy Kleinberg
Lorie Van Auken

::::::

If these Widows are on TV a lot...then it is a GOOD thing, Mez.
They have important issues that need to be addressed. Issues that should be of concern to everyone...Left or Right.

Editor & Publisher


 |  IP: Logged
Filth Hound
VoivodFan
Member # 811

posted June 09, 2006 13:37     Profile for Filth Hound   Email Filth Hound     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
well it did help her get her new book on the top of the best seller list.I think doing stupid shit just to make money for yourself is shitty.
Just like what the Dicksuck'n chicks did to get there album on the top of the charts.
If you have to stir up a bunch of people to draw attention to your album or book then you really dont have any talent and should stop stealing peoples hard earned money.

 |  IP: Logged
K
VoivodFan
Member # 6

posted June 10, 2006 15:06     Profile for K   Email K     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Wrong.

The results would come out different with just ONE investigation.


 |  IP: Logged
K
VoivodFan
Member # 6

posted June 12, 2006 10:14     Profile for K   Email K     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
Another. Meaning something other than the 9-11 Commission's so-called Investigation.

Another...An Other.

1. One more; an additional: had another cup of coffee.
2. Distinctly different from the first: took another route to town.
3. Some other: put it off to another day.

The results would come out different with just ONE (Other) Investigation. Another.


 |  IP: Logged
Cthon
Moderator
Member # 156

posted June 14, 2006 20:20     Profile for Cthon   Email Cthon     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
you know Coulter probably never even read her own research. it was probably quoted by one of her contributors/editors and she ok'ed it. shes not a plagiarist, shes just a lazy writer.


just like Bush (or most any politician) doesnt read one sentence of any one of the zillion studies that he quotes 24/7.

--------------------

www.myspace.com/mastersofpunkrock


 |  IP: Logged
Cthon
Moderator
Member # 156

posted June 23, 2006 12:16     Profile for Cthon   Email Cthon     Send New Private Message   Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote
funny Coulter quiz... i got 6 wrong.
http://www.people.virginia.edu/%7Ejac3he/GiveUpQuiz/hitlercoulterquiz.html

--------------------

www.myspace.com/mastersofpunkrock


 |  IP: Logged

All times are ET  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | VoivodFan

Powered by Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin Board 6.04