|
Author
|
Topic: HEY LIBERAL AMERICA!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezcalhead
VoivodFan
Member # 26
|
posted November 16, 2004 10:01
    
CONGRATULATIONS !!!
WE THE PEOPLE ….. HELPED RE-ELECT PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH IN SPITE OF THE “SPIN” AND “ENDORSEMENTS” OF JOHN KERRY BY THE LIBERAL MEDIA: Peter Jennings ABC Tom Brokaw NBC Dan Rather CBS Larry King, Wolf Blitzer, & James Carville of CNN The New York Times The Los Angeles Times The Washington Post Chicago Sun-Times San Francisco Chronicle The Boston Globe The Philadelphia Inquirer Arizona Daily Star The Oregonian The Seattle Times The New Yorker The Star-Ledger etc. etc. etc. AND OTHER KERRY ENDORSEMENTS BY: The Communist Party Vietnamese Communists The Socialist Party Yasser Arafat Organization of the Islamic Conference American Muslim Taskforce AND THE FOLLOWING KERRY SUPPORTERS: Bill and Hillary Clinton Jimmy Carter and Al Gore Sen. Ted Kennedy & Sen. Robert Byrd Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson General Wesley Clark and Sandy Berger George Soros and Richard Clarke Sen. Tom Daschle and Rep. Nancy Polosi John Kerry and the other John Kerry AND 99.99% OF THE HOLLYWOOD CROWD: Michael Moore & Barbra Streisand Steven Bing & Ben Affleck Bruce Springsteen & Michael Stipe George Clooney & Martin Sheen Michael J. Fox & Warren Beatty Aaron Sorkin & Harvey Weinstein etc. etc. etc. PLUS: DNC and Kerry Campaign attorneys attempting to intimidate anyone who did not agree with Kerry including the Swift Boat Veterans and the P.O.W.’s AND WITHOUT ANY HELP FROM: United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan France’s President Jacques Chirac Germany’s Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder IT IS AMAZING, BUT WE DID IT WITH OUR SECRET WEAPON CALLED THE “TRUTH” NOTE: Based on some very conservative statistical analysis, seven levels of “forwarding” the “elections2004” e-mails to your friends has resulted in well over forty million people receiving an average of twenty articles supporting President Bush for re-election. YOU helped make it happen. Thanks.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezcalhead
VoivodFan
Member # 26
|
posted November 18, 2004 14:37
quote:
Originally posted by Lycanthropy:
Because "right to choose" is not being "pro-abortion". It's more being "pro-freedom". You don't need to actually like abortions or their procedures to respect that a woman has a fundamental right to decide what is best for her and her body. Banning safe and legal abortion is oppression of women. Now that's Christian. 
That's apple and oranges Lync. The right to choose does mean you are pro-abortion. Let's call it like it is.
You don't need to actually like abortions or their procedures to respect that a woman has a fundamental right to decide what is best for her and her body. Huh? Being pro-choice means you are condoning this action. (Before you go into hysterics I am pro-choice)
| IP: Logged
|
|
LyKcantropen
VoivodFan
Member # 162
|
posted November 18, 2004 16:15
quote:
Before you go into hysterics
I wasn't going to, actually. It's a difficult question, and I don't actually have any problem with people who are anti-abortion, unless they're militant about it. The word you guys were looking for is "semantics".  On that note, I still wouldn't ever call it being "pro-abortion". You can be anti-abortion but pro-choice, for instance. Against the idea in the case of you and your family, but in recognition that it's a personal choice. I suppose a person like that is rare (more likely among secularists, I would guess), but it can happen, so making insinuations is probably ill-advised. Anyway, I don't really want to get into an abortion argument, get enough of those other places.
| IP: Logged
|
|
posted November 16, 2004 10:14
